Smart Ways to Get More Reviews [Guide]
Practical, proven ways for any business to get more authentic reviews.
TLDR: The FTC fake review rule bans fake or paid reviews, undisclosed insider reviews, fake “independent” review sites you control, and suppressing or scrubbing honest negative reviews. Penalties can exceed $50,000 per violation, and the rule applies to the small local business down the street, not just national brands. It does not ban asking customers for reviews. The safe and more effective move is to collect private feedback from everyone, fix problems fast, and invite honest public reviews without filtering by who you think will be nice.
The FTC fake review rule is the Federal Trade Commission’s “Rule on the Use of Consumer Reviews and Testimonials,” which took effect in October 2024. In plain English, it makes several common review tricks illegal and gives the FTC the power to seek civil penalties for them, penalties that can top $50,000 per violation. If you run a plumbing company, a salon, a cleaning service, an HVAC shop, or any local business that lives on its Google and Yelp rating, this rule is about you as much as it is about any national brand.
Here is the part most owners get wrong. They assume “fake review rule” means “the FTC is coming for anyone who asks for reviews.” That is not what it says. Asking your customers for honest reviews is fine and always has been. What the rule targets is a specific set of dishonest tactics: manufacturing reviews, buying them, hiding who wrote them, and burying the honest bad ones. If you have never done any of that, you are mostly in the clear. The trap is that a few tactics marketed to small businesses as clever “reputation” moves sit right on the wrong side of the line.
Yes. This is the single most important thing to understand. The rule does not carve out an exception for small operators, and the FTC has been explicit that it applies broadly. A one-truck service company that pays a marketing agency to seed a handful of five-star reviews is exposed the same way a large company is. In some ways small businesses are more exposed, because the shortcuts are tempting when you are staring at three reviews and a competitor has three hundred, and because the tactics that get sold to local businesses (buy a starter pack of reviews, gate the unhappy ones, threaten anyone who posts something negative) are exactly the ones the rule was written to stop.
The good news is that the compliant path is not only legal, it works better and costs less than the risky shortcuts. More on that below.
Here is the rule translated into things a service business owner would actually recognize.
| Banned practice | What it looks like in real life |
|---|---|
| Fake or false reviews | Writing your own five-star reviews, posting reviews from people who never used you, or generating reviews with AI to look busier than you are. |
| Buying reviews | Paying anyone for a positive review, or paying for a negative review of a competitor. Includes conditioning a discount or gift on the sentiment of the review. |
| Undisclosed insider reviews | An employee, owner, or their family member posts a glowing review without disclosing the relationship. |
| Fake independent review sites | Running a “best plumbers in town” site that looks neutral but is secretly controlled by you to promote yourself. |
| Buying fake followers or views | Purchasing bots, fake followers, or fake engagement to look more popular or trusted than you are. |
| Review suppression | Using threats, intimidation, or baseless legal threats to force a customer to remove an honest negative review, or scrubbing negatives so your public rating misrepresents reality. |
None of the allowed items require a lawyer to pull off. They are just good service with a system behind them.
This is the question that matters most for how a lot of local businesses actually operate, so let me be precise. The FTC fake review rule does not contain a line that says “review gating is banned.” But it does prohibit suppressing honest reviews, and it prohibits misrepresenting that the reviews on a page reflect all reviews when you have quietly filtered out the negative ones.
“Review gating” usually means this setup: you ask “how did we do,” happy answers get routed to a public Google or Yelp link, and unhappy answers get routed to a private form that never becomes a public review. When the design and effect of your system is to keep negative reviews off public platforms while funneling positive ones on, you are operating close to the suppression provisions, and you are also violating the posted policies of Google and Yelp regardless of the FTC. Even before this rule, that “intercept bad reviews” approach was risky. Now the legal downside is bigger.
The honest version looks almost identical and is completely defensible: you ask everyone for private feedback, you fix what is broken, and then you invite everyone to leave a public review. You are not deciding who is eligible based on sentiment. Timing changes; eligibility does not. We break the distinction down in detail in how to ask for reviews without being shady (and without review gating).
The FTC can seek civil penalties for violations, and the maximum per-violation amount is adjusted for inflation each year and now sits above $50,000. “Per violation” is the phrase that should get your attention. A batch of fake reviews is not one violation, it is potentially many. Beyond the dollar figure, there is the reputational damage of being named in an FTC action, which for a local business that trades on trust can be worse than the fine. And that is before Google or Yelp catches the same behavior and removes reviews, flags your profile, or suspends your listing.
You do not need to memorize the exact figure. You need to know that the downside is large enough that no starter pack of purchased reviews is worth it.
Here is the good news that owners miss: the compliant approach is not a watered-down version of the aggressive one. It usually produces more reviews and a stronger rating over time, because it is built on actually catching and fixing problems instead of hiding them. Here is the playbook.
This is exactly where a tool helps, and it is worth being clear about how. Tools like VisibleFeedback intercept dissatisfaction before it turns into a public one-star, not by hiding it, but by giving every customer a private channel to raise a problem and routing that problem to the right person fast. VisibleFeedback was built to catch issues before they show up on Yelp or Google, then invite honest reviews and send recurring service reminders that bring customers back. Because you are collecting feedback from everyone and inviting reviews without filtering, you get the reputation upside of a system without stepping toward the suppression line. And at $65 a month with no contract, versus the $299 to $699 the big platforms charge, it is built for a business running a truck or two, not a national chain.
| If you are doing this | You are | Do this instead |
|---|---|---|
| Writing or generating your own reviews | Over the line | Ask real customers to share honest experiences |
| Paying for reviews or five-star-only incentives | Over the line | Thank customers, never condition on sentiment |
| Gating unhappy customers away from public review | Risky | Private feedback first, then invite everyone |
| Threatening reviewers to remove honest negatives | Over the line | Respond professionally in public |
| Asking every customer for an honest review | Fine | Keep doing it, make it one tap |
| Flagging genuinely fake or policy-breaking reviews | Fine | Use the platform’s reporting tools |
Are fake reviews illegal now? Yes. Under the FTC fake review rule, creating, buying, or disseminating fake or false consumer reviews and testimonials is prohibited, and the FTC can seek civil penalties that can exceed $50,000 per violation. This includes reviews written by you, by people who never used your service, or generated by AI to look busier than you are.
Can I still ask my customers for reviews? Absolutely. The rule does not restrict honest review requests. You can and should ask customers for reviews. What you cannot do is fake them, pay for them, hide who wrote them, or suppress honest negative ones. Asking is not the problem; manipulating the outcome is.
Is it illegal to only ask happy customers for reviews? The rule does not name “review gating” directly, but it does prohibit suppressing honest reviews. A system whose design and effect is to keep negative reviews off public platforms leans toward that prohibition, and it also violates Google and Yelp policies. The safe approach is to collect private feedback from everyone, fix issues, then invite everyone to review, with timing rather than sentiment deciding when the invite goes out.
Does the FTC fake review rule apply to a small local business? Yes. There is no small-business exemption. A local plumber, salon, or cleaning company is covered the same as a national brand, and the shortcuts marketed to small businesses (buying a review starter pack, gating, threatening reviewers) are exactly what the rule targets.
Can I offer a discount in exchange for a review? You can thank customers for leaving an honest review, but do not condition any incentive on the review being positive or on a particular star rating. Tying a reward to sentiment is where an incentive crosses into buying a review. When unsure, keep incentives off the table and rely on timing and good service instead. For the texting side of this, see is it legal to text customers for reviews.
The FTC fake review rule sounds scary, and for anyone running the old bag of tricks it should. But for an honest local business, the message is simple and even freeing: you never needed the fake reviews, the paid reviews, or the gating to win. Those tactics carry real legal risk now, and they were always a sign of a business trying to paper over problems instead of fixing them. The rule just makes the honest path the only smart path.
Collect private feedback from every customer, fix what breaks fast, and invite honest reviews without filtering. You will end up with a rating you can defend to a regulator, a customer, or a competitor, and one that keeps climbing because it is real. If you want that to run automatically on every job, start a free 14-day trial of VisibleFeedback, no credit card required.

Email clients after every job. Catch issues early, recover unhappy clients fast, and drive repeat work with smart reminders.

Austin Spaeth is the founder of VisibleFeedback, a tool that helps service companies automate post-job follow-ups, catch issues early, and drive repeat work with smart reminders. With a background in software development and a focus on practical customer retention systems, Austin built VisibleFeedback to make it easy to email customers after every job, route problems to the right person, and keep relationships strong without awkward outreach. When he’s not building new features or writing playbooks for service businesses, he’s wrangling his six kids or sneaking in a beach day.
Whether you’re dealing with callbacks, unhappy customers, or low repeat work, we’ll help you tighten the follow up loop.
No credit card required.